New punishment guidelines leading upto 3.0

[Doug Jumper]

Recently myself and the staff team have seen a large increase in rule breaks. Most likely people are getting restless and are waiting for 3.0 to come out. It is near but we want to release the update as good as we've hyped it up to be and we had some set backs with one developer leaving and not giving us any of the stuff he worked on. We can't have people having a rule break mindset moving into 3.0 because we do want more role play, not that the main core game play is going to change but just in general we will have more players which will allow us to be stricter on the rules and banning the toxic players.

From now leading up to 3.0 we will be doing a no tolerance policy meaning there will be no warnings (unless the player is new and has had no warnings before), all rule breaks will result in bans. If the person is requesting compensation the compensation must be given and the ban will also be issued.

If you receive more than 35 points from now and the release of 3.0 you will be banned on release day for 24 hours. (People currently above 35 points if you receive any points you will be put into this category.)

Please take 10 minutes out of your day to read through the rules so you don't get yourself banned.

 

[Harry Slater]

Does cops with shitty roleplay fall under this?

[Doug Jumper]

Just now, Martin Goodman said:

Does cops with shitty roleplay fall under this?

Yes, any cops with bad roleplay please report them. They're held to a higher standard than your average player.

[Harry Slater]

Just now, Doug Jumper said:

Yes, any cops with bad roleplay please report them. They're held to a higher standard than your average player.

10-4

[Matt Engel]

lol this guy ^^^^ someone always has to make a comment about cops 

 

[Dustin Cena]

Does civs with shitty roleplay fall under this? I want to make sure what comes around, goes around.

[Lewis Free]

it is implied lads, everyone who breaks a rule gets done for noncing init

[Harry Slater]

Just now, Dustin Cena said:

Does civs with shitty roleplay fall under this? I want to make sure what comes around, goes around.

i'm just a bit salty with these 3 shitty cops that like the hands up words without valid reason as they like a bit of combat

[Robert Lewis]

no more points 

[Matt Engel]

dude of course cops have to follow this, its rules for everyone stop with the BS and act like an adult. Im not saying cops are better im saying the smart comments are not necessary we all should be following the rules and trying our best to keep the server going and with roleplay instead of turning it into a King of the hill server.

 

[Lewis Free]

woah lads, chill man 

you man are taking this way out of proportion 

[Christian Thomas]

4 minutes ago, Matt Engel said:

dude of course cops have to follow this, its rules for everyone stop with the BS and act like an adult.

 

 

[Harry Slater]

5 minutes ago, Christian Thomas said:

 

ahaha Yikeeerrrrs

[Johhny Appleseed]

9 minutes ago, Matt Engel said:

dude of course cops have to follow this, its rules for everyone stop with the BS and act like an adult. Im not saying cops are better im saying the smart comments are not necessary we all should be following the rules and trying our best to keep the server going and with roleplay instead of turning it into a King of the hill server.

 

 

[Kain McCloud]

Speaking as a player not as State Command in this case I think in 3.0 if you set up "shifts" for lack of a better term for a few staff members to be in game "on duty" observing situations invisible and interjecting in obvious rule break situations a lot would calm down. This is an active environment and the only way you really get people to calm down and abide is if they know they are being watched and could be potentially taken down right on the spot. You have to rely on other people to report situations and that emboldens people because they cant always do that. Take that out of the equation and give people something to legitimately fear and hold them in line, it might go away. Communities used to do that but it seemed to have gone away in the recent years. 

[Trym Gym]

12 minutes ago, Dustin Cena said:

Does civs with shitty roleplay fall under this? I want to make sure what comes around, goes around.

Lol no, civs dont have a SOP.

[Kain McCloud]

Also KSP members if you are going to comment keep it constructive and don't get into pissing matches. 

 

[Doug Jumper]

1 minute ago, Trym Gym said:

Lol no, civs dont have a SOP.

You're an official gang you do have SOP.

[Matt Engel]

They were already in a situation with cops lol what do you mean plus you were driving transport truck lol you think its a green zone, your driving transport truck and we were chasing you for awhile the S1 got cleared and your boys started shooting at cops before I shot you so yea. Also your boys stopped and attacked swat before this how about you show it all

[Trym Gym]

2 minutes ago, Doug Jumper said:

You're an official gang you do have SOP.

We do?

[Jason Marlito]

uhhh I have 45 points already does this mean I am getting banend

 

[Matao Stoner]

8 minutes ago, Matt Engel said:

They were already in a situation with cops lol what do you mean plus you were driving transport truck lol you think its a green zone, your driving transport truck and we were chasing you for awhile the S1 got cleared and your boys started shooting at cops before I shot you so yea. Also your boys stopped and attacked swat before this how about you show it all

none shot till you did bud and you cant s1 without a marked car CID Sergeant btw

[Doug Jumper]

4 minutes ago, Jason Macks said:

uhhh I have 45 points already does this mean I am getting banend

 

If you get anymore points yes.

[Josh Ross]

Will staff members get punished 

[Julian Jackson]

Not sure about this man, there’s people on this sever that get a hella kick out of reporting people and getting them points, people make mistakes and people that don’t break rules might be punished too harshly