Jump to content

Aiden Sparker

Donator
  • Content Count

    79
  • Donations

    $30.00 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

7 Neutral

1 Follower

About Aiden Sparker

  • Rank
    Legend

Recent Profile Visitors

69 profile views
  1. Aiden Sparker

    Negotiations at majors

    To address this statement: No, I was completely in touch with the server rules, the "admin" started talking about the bible, and so I tried to explain the ACTUAL rules to him, not just what they're used to. Because back then(when this video was shot), there was a rule. The glorious, rule 8.10 that stated the following: "During a major crime, the gang or civilians doing the major, has to identify the exact amount of hostages and/or externals before negotiations end". In fact we did have an external, but I was dead-set on having them negotiate for the information, and with regard to server rules, I was(at that time) well within my right to do so, as that rule just stated that I had to tell them at some point, during negotiations. The problem was that a lot of rumors had come up about those rules, back then I didn't actually have to tell them when they asked, even though everybody thought that was how it worked. I did this a couple of times during majors and well, at last, I figured some high-command member in KSP got enough of it and had the rule changed. This is exactly as @Doug Jumper says: The police especially are very set on what they used to do and is not very open to change, which is in my opinion, a damned shame. Now this is another thing, it is quite ridiculous that the KSP believes hostages to be the only form of leverage. At that time I technically had access to a laboratory containing multiple virusses and research projects that could've had meaning to the entire human species. I tried to RP, but yet the detective refused to and was dead-set on having a gunfight. In fact, the gang in this instance, was ready to lay down arms, just for a little talk, but because you refused to, it ended in a gunfight. ZERO hostages does not mean ZERO leverage, and I believe that is something you have to start learning your negotiators. KSP is supposed to advocate for a peaceful resolution, something that the video shows no sign of the detective even trying. I am not trying to rant, I am just trying to prove a point.
  2. Aiden Sparker

    Negotiations at majors

    In this post I see a lot of cop sided opinions and civ sided opinions. My point is to make it more balanced as it is ridiculously cop sided right now. This video is a good example of how cops utilize their numbers in majors and has no interest in even talking to the potential hostage taker, before storming the building killing everyone inside without any form of legitimate negotiation attempt or valuing of life BECAUSE of their numbers and superiority in gear. (This video is before the 8.10 rule change that dictated that a civilian negotiator has to surrender the information when ASKED, instead of "before negotiations end")
  3. Aiden Sparker

    Negotiations at majors

    Which will then, in turn, give cops a reason to make negotiations longer, just like civilians. A lot of the time when I've negotiated for a gang on the civ side, the cops just don't really care at all and usually try to have the negotiations blown off at once. I always try to strike up conversation and actually negotiate.
  4. Aiden Sparker

    The Schneider Family is looking for active players

    Full Name - Caden Parker Age (15 minimum) - 16 years old Region - Europe, Denmark Why would you like to join the Schneider Family? (80 words minimum) - I would like to join The Schneider Family because you seem nice and well organized. I have during my time in Shadow Division met you guys a couple of times, and honestly, you seemed really chill. The Shadow Division recently has lost a lot of members, mostly including command members, who I liked a lot. I know that they have in fact joined the Schneider Family, and for that reason as well I would like to join the family. All in all you guys seem real nice, and I would love to be apart of your journey:) What can you bring to the family? - I usually negotiate during Major Crimes, but that doesn't mean I can't shoot. Negotiation and Combat are my delicates. How many days have you been on the island? - Not sure, about a month. What are your strengths or weaknesses? (4 sentences minimum) - Well to be honest, I don't really know if I have a lot of either. I mean, people usually tend to like me, so I do something right, atleast socially. I do though get stressed quite easily, which causes me to tilt, though those situations are extremely rare. Other than that I am just confident at the game, due to my 2300+ hours. Do you acknowledge and respect the authority of high ranking officers inside the family and why? - Well you must understand that my answer is yes. It is important to respect your higher rankings, because that is just how it is, they have experience and so they have been chosen to lead the family. How many hours do you have on Arma 3? - 2321 hours How active will you be? - Every single day. Do you have any current gang affiliations? - I have recently resigned from Shadow Division, together with other members, including Alex Brody, John Olsen and Noah- and Pelle Uni Do you understand that in our gang we hold rules and guidelines that must be followed? - I fully understand Do you understand that in our gang we uphold all the rules that Anzus has in place? - I fully understand Paste your steam account here: https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198077819578/
  5. Dear Applicant, Congratulations! Your application has been approved and selected to move forward to the interview phase. Please note, however, that this acceptance in no way guarantees your membership with the Shadow Division. For the next step in the recruitment process, we would like to meet with you on our Discord Server to conduct your Interview. You will have a period of 3 days from today to complete your interview. If you cannot meet that deadline for any reason, please reply to your application below to request a time extension. Shadow Division Discord - https://discord.gg/w4VmpFW Recommended Interview Times: 10am - 10pm MST (these are only recommended times; interviews can be conducted at any time). Regards, Shadow Division
  6. Aiden Sparker

    Caden Parker - Player Report

    No need. It WAS me, but I would like to add that it was not intentional, and that it was my brother that tripped over my computer cable because he is fucking stupid. My computer takes approx. 10-15 mins to boot into Arma, so I didn't have time because I was actually headed to work. So I mean, yes, it was me and you can punish me accordingly, but please know that it wasn't intentional. Hope you can forgive this honest mistake ^^ Regards
  7. Character Details Character Name: Aiden Sparker Character Primary Faction (e.g. Civ, Cop, Mafia, ect.): Cop Are you currently under employment by any corporation: I am not, no. Do you plan to practice privately, in a firm, as a public defender or as a prosecutor? I would like to practice privately. Do you currently have an offer of a job in any of these? Unfortunately not. Do you have a mentor lawyer that you know that could assist you in practice when you first start? No, but I have experience from Fisher's Island, near New York. References from current lawyers (not required but very helpful): None, unfortunately. Personal Details (IRL) Age: 16 years of age Date of Birth: February 15th 2003 Steam64 ID: 76561198077819578 TeamSpeak ID (or Name): Caden Parker Country: Denmark Timezone: GMT+2 Character Questions Persons already accepted into a police prosecutor position may skip these questions Do you have any experience and particular skills as a lawyer? (Min 50 words or 5 dot points): On Fisher's Island I had a firm doing private law advising, how to act and not to act in court. I was FIBA certified and at the time I also held a position with the Fisher's Island Sheriff's Department, so it was part time. But might still count, so I just thought I'd include it Why would you like to become a lawyer in Kamdan? (Min 75 words or 10 dot points): I would like to become a lawyer because honestly, I believe the cops does a lot of unconstitutional arrests and detentions for the sake of saving time. I have always wanted to set out to take this matter into my hands and help the citizens of Kamdan get more fond of the law, and actually getting to know what they can, and can't do. And most importantly what law enforcement is allowed to and not allowed to do. Other than that I would like to be counsel during court proceedings. What are your strengths and weaknesses as a lawyer? (Min 50 words): Well, a strength of mine is that I am determined, most definitely. While this is a strength, it can also be a weakness as in my opinion, I certainly have a lot of strengths that I believe the DoJ would benefit from. Being determined is one of them, but also include(yetnot limited to): Tenacity, strength in self, calm and collected during stressful situations, like a court case can become. How many hours a year (a week) can you put into the Department of Justice? Definitely 10+ hours a week What is your goal as a position within 2 months of being accepted? I would like to see myself become a judge. Why should your application be accepted? (Min 25 words): Well, it should be accepted because I am determined to protect the civilians of this community from unconstitutional proceedings and rights violations to them as citizens. Disclosure Have You Been Previously Struck Off the Roll (e.g. been kicked out of the DOJ)? I have not. If Yes, For What Reason? N/A Do you have Current Pending Criminal Charges Against You? No. If so, what charges? N/A Disclose Any of the Following Convictions; Murder of a Judge executing his duties, Attack of a Courthouse or Terrorist Acts Towards the Courts: None Disclose Any Convictions for Perjury or Lying Under Oath in Kamdan: None Please Disclose the Number of Past Applications For Admission Made: Absolutely none Please Disclose Reasons for the Denied Applications: (if any have occurred) N/A Do you have any Past Bans on ANZUS Gaming? Nope If you have answered yes to any of the above, please explain why we should still accept your application: N/A Bar Test For your application to be successful you must pass over 80% in the Bar Exam. (70% if you have a reference) If you fail the first time you will be allowed to try the supplementary exam on which you must achieve 75% or an interview which you must pass. Questions are rotated over time and per candidate. YOU MUST NOT DISCUSS THE QUESTIONS IN THIS EXAM WITH ANY OTHER PERSON BEFORE THE TEST, WHILE THE TEST IS ONGOING, or AFTER THE TEST. The contents of the test are confidential. Link to Test. - Administered by the Supreme Court of Kamdan Please complete the application and submit it then take the test after. Tests taken before submitting an application may result in your application not being successful. (Even if under a different name) Legal Note Knowingly providing false or misleading information on this document is a crime punishable by up to 15 months imprisonment and/or a $200,000 fine. Attempting to breach examination rules is a civil offence punishable by up to a $50,000 fine. This will render you ineligible to reapply without special leave of the Supreme Court of Kamdan. EDIT: Did the test with 100%
  8. Dear Applicant, Congratulations! Your application has been approved and selected to move forward to the interview phase. Please note, however, that this acceptance in no way guarantees your membership with the Shadow Division. For the next step in the recruitment process, we would like to meet with you on our Discord Server to conduct your Interview. You will have a period of 3 days from today to complete your interview. If you cannot meet that deadline for any reason, please reply to your application below to request a time extension. Shadow Division Discord - https://discord.gg/w4VmpFW Recommended Interview Times: 10am - 10pm MST (these are only recommended times; interviews can be conducted at any time). Regards, Shadow Division
  9. Aiden Sparker

    Negotiations at majors

    The rule in question: 8.10 – If the police request to know about externals/snipers at a major crime then the criminals are required to tell the police how many externals there are. They may not lie. Any externals that are undeclared may be reported for RDM. If the number of externals change during negotiations or the number of externals have not yet been declared, you must tell police the number of externals presently at the major crime before you call off negotiations or just after police call negotiations off. Failure to do this may also cause externals to be reported for RDM Before I proceed with this suggestion I would like to clarify that this is not a rant, but simply an outreach to make major crime situations a little bit more fair to civilians / gangs. Nowhere in this post am I at all striving to be toxic or inappropriate in any way what so ever. Hello to whoever may read this, I would like to formally object to rule 8.10, as I find it simply hurting roleplay / negotiation situations during major crimes. It states that any gang or negotiator for said party is to make any externals known to police during negotiations at a commencing major crime. Now, before the rule was changed I used it as leverage, as it stated: "During the commencing of a major crime, the gang conducting said major, had to make the amount of hostages / externals known to police before negotiations end."(or something along those lines). Which means that a hostage taker could use it as leverage to drag out the conversation. This leverage was revoked and taken away from gangs, giving the cops yet another advantage. Keep in mind that I am not trying to rant at all, but as I have now read the rules(and especially major crime rules) several times, it has occured to me how cop sided majors actually are: - They always have the numbers(we don't know how many they are, but for some reason they have to know how many we are) - They have far superior weapons and tactical capabilities not available to civilians(Superior and more damaging rounds, shields, flashbangs etc.) - Rules on their side(the fact that medics have to pick them up first, unless litterally threatened to pick someone else up first is a great example of this) I see a couple of ways that you can give a little back to the civilians, what with regarding rule 8.10: - Change up the rule to make it even and/or two-sided, meaning if the cops wants to know how many externals we have, we have to know how many they are or something along those lines. - Make it a leverage for civilian negotiators, meaning cops will have to negotiate for the information if they want it, instead of having it surrendered to them as soon as they ask. (This will add some roleplay to the proceedings) - Revoke it, as it is simply ridiculously stupid I encourage everyone to give feedback on this matter, may it support or not support my case, I would like to hear your thoughts Regards
  10. Aiden Sparker

    Cant start a major when you have more people than cops

    This video is a couple of days old and that rule has been changed yesterday. It was changed due to me pointing out to both the staff team AND the police, that the previous rule(before changed) did not in fact state when I had to say it, just that I had to say it at some point. And yes I have seen the rule, as I read the rules pretty much every day to have them memorised. The rule was broken, and apparently no one had noticed, I just used it while I could. In fact I motion to have the rule be two-sided. Is it really fair that the criminals can't know how many they're up against, when police can?
  11. Aiden Sparker

    Cant start a major when you have more people than cops

    Negotiation for a potential hostage taker is all about delaying, but "that's a discussion for another time". Apparently you didn't notice that the cop actually started everything about the gods, that's why I wanted to tell him the actual truth, but that cop was a piece of shit and litterally a perfect example of how ridiculous the police force really is. As far as I am concerned the were no disciplinary action taken towards this officer, despite his completely reckless actions. It seems as though you are quite set on your opinion, so I will not be engaging further in this conversation, as it seems you are a lost cause.
  12. Aiden Sparker

    Cant start a major when you have more people than cops

    The problem, @Kyle Lawson, is that there is nothing stopping the cops from responding with 30 people to a Lab major with 4 or 5 gang members and just rushing the fuck out of it. Take for example this video, where I try to negotiate, but the cop gives a rats ass and calls it of immediately, without any form of investigative proceedings to find out if I am holding someone hostage, whereafter we are rushed, because they have the numbers and we're outgunned. Please, I urge you to take a look at this video:
  13. Aiden Sparker

    Cant start a major when you have more people than cops

    Both are still easily rushed if you have the numbers. You're missing the point.
  14. Aiden Sparker

    Cant start a major when you have more people than cops

    Both are easily rushed if you have sufficient numbers. The thing with fed is that there is litterally one hallway that you can hold easily, even if severely outnumbered. That is why Federal Reserve is THE ONLY civ sided major, police always has the numbers.
  15. Aiden Sparker

    Cant start a major when you have more people than cops

    That is because fed is the only civ sided major. Btw we in shadow did 10v30
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By viewing ANZUSGaming's website you agree to our Terms of Use