Your In-Game Name: Nijal Lun
Badge Number: 170
Punishment you where given: Verbal Warning for minor unprofessionalism
Why it should be overturned: I received a punishment for stating to a suspect "It sucks to be you". It is a stretch to consider that minor unprofesionalism and contrary to what is intended for interaction in this island. This should not have been a case to begin with.
The context of the situation, which was over the multiple hour interaction with the person involved in this case, began as a trolling event at DOC. Multiple aircraft, being 3 airplanes and a helicopter, began flying at extremely low altitude over DOC for multiple passes. A few rounds were fired at the planes before I directed those involved to stop shooting. After several more minutes and numerous flyovers, all 3 planes crashed into DOC within 1 minute of each other. One of the planes crashed into the front gate (being the plane involved with this case), one plane missed tower 2 and crashed near the west parking lot of DOC, and the third plane crashed into the top of the internal building and severely injured myself. Engine noise was observed from all 3 aircraft during their crash.
When all the persons involved were revived by medics, they were either ticketed and released (as was the person in the complaint) or charged and placed into custody. The person involved requested a supervisor during his release, where he asked for equipment and a vehicle. This was denied by an unrelated supervisor and the complainant stated that "I'm just going to stay here and annoy you" followed by "Ill just sit here then" "keep trespassing, you know". The person involved refused to follow instruction, refused to depart from DOC, and was given multiple chances to stop trespassing within the walls of DOC. This was again refused. The person was eventually tased and charged with trespassing.
At this point, the person requested another supervisor. This is where I come in. During the response to the supervisor, the person stated that we should have attempted to crash tackle. The person then asked for IA (which was denied because of no IA being on), a lawyer (which was provided and issued no complaint to the treatment of the person), and numerous complaints involving his treatment (none of which involved me). When the person's lawyer asked to take the trespassing charge to court, we attempted to secure a judge, who was also unavailable. The person continued to argue, during his explanation of why he was in custody, that the escalation of force wasn't followed, which i was not involved in. The person stated that he was contemplating filing an IA case on the other officers for this reason. The person then asked for a higher supervisor than myself to continue to argue his case. This was denied as there was no one else within my chain of command who was available at the time.
Any evidence to support this: I have an hour long video involving the entire incident. 45 of those minutes involve a direct conversation with the person who made the complaint, who was uncooperative, verbally combative, and repetitive. One sentence of this conversation was scrutinized. The person insisted on arguing SOP's, semantics, every avenue that was available, and every second of his incident ad nauseam. I can post that or any specific point of the story if requested.
I am having a hard time within this 45 minutes that the sentence of "It sucks to be you" was actually said. As IA cannot show me this evidence, I don't have anything offhand regarding the incident. If I find it, ill post it.