Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

Jack Fire

Management
  • Content Count

    520
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    10

Jack Fire last won the day on December 13 2019

Jack Fire had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

116 Excellent

About Jack Fire

  • Rank
    Forum Hero
  • Birthday July 31

Recent Profile Visitors

2,098 profile views
  1. Application Subject to Change Pt 1: Personal Details In-Game Name (General Alias): TeamSpeak Name: Age: Country you live in: Timezone you operate on: Steam 64 ID: (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zEfBw5JEMf0 or https://steamidfinder.com/) Pt 2: Admission Questionnaire Do you have any experience and particular skills as a lawyer? (Min 50 words or 5 dot points) What are your strengths and weaknesses as a lawyer? (Min 50 words) How many hours a year (a week) can you put into the Department of Justice? What is your goal as a position within 2 months of being accepted? Why should your application be accepted? (Min 25 words) Pt 3: Disclosure Have You Been Previously Struck Off the Roll: (e.g. been kicked out of the DOJ) If Yes, For What Reason: Do you have Current Pending Criminal Charges Against You? (And if so, what charges) Disclose Any of the Following Convictions; Murder of a Judge executing his duties, Attack of a Courthouse or Terrorist Acts Towards the Courts: Disclose Any Convictions for Perjury or Lying Under Oath in Kings County: Please Disclose the Number of Past Applications For Admission Made: Please Disclose Reasons for the Denied Applications: (if any have occurred) Do you have any Bans on ANZUS Gaming? If yes to any of the above questions then please explain why In spite of these, why should we accept your application? End Application
  2. Jack Fire

    Wells v. Kamdan State Police

    @Ninj Red Please provide submissions through the proper form within 16 hours or the case may be decided summarily. As to who is taking the case I am acting as the registry, it is likely another judge will act if the case continues to court due to time zone differences.
  3. Jack Fire

    Wells v. Kamdan State Police

    The motion to disqualify counsel is denied. The motion to hold the case is also denied however the trial date will be set after January 3 due to judges being on holidays. (There is no point of setting the trial at the relevant times as submissions are not due, the motion is now unnecessary) Plaintiff’s submissions due by 31 December 2019 @Edward Boyd Defendant’s submissions due by 2 January 2020. @Ninj Red both parties please attach a sheet of availability of counsel. Witness lists must be attached to submissions. Trial date will be set in due course.
  4. Jack Fire

    12-DCR-2006 - State of Kamdan v. Matata

    Closed as person has been exiled from Kamdan
  5. Jack Fire

    Removal From Position Policy

    This policy is in force as of 17/12/19
  6. Jack Fire

    Josh Black - Point Appeal

    Senate Disciplinary Appeal Committee Disciplinary Appeal Case Number: A009 Kamdan Legislature Officer Presiding: Jack Fire, Jake Dingas, Jose Mourinho Josh BLACK APPLICANT and KAMDAN STATE POLICE RESPONDENT Evidence IA File. Witness statements from Jordan Goulding and Harry Lenmar. Video Evidence provided by Josh Black Findings of Fact Mr Josh Black did unload the transport truck. Mr Josh Black knew how to unload the transport truck as he was just told how to. He knew it was not his job to do so. Mr Josh Black attempted to run off the DOC Island in an attempt to stop unloading the truck. This is supported by the fact Mr. Josh Black attempted to return to DOC as soon as it finished unloading. He was not attempting to run away with the money. Mr Josh Black returned all money which was sourced from the Transport Truck at the earliest opportunity. There are no recent records of an SOP violation alone causing a punishment of 15 points. 10 points is extremely rare and only for second offenses of the same class or where a person is a commanding officer setting a bad example. Mr Josh Black has no records of breaching SOP 7.11.3 (In the IA case or on the forums) or other related SOPs which involve money. Mr Josh Black has a series of offenses in his history but also has a series of successful appeals for past terminations. Judgement We are satisfied there is a 'clear as day' SOP breach, as provided by Officer Ninj Red's statement in the IA case notes. This was the only reference to why the punishment was chosen. There was no reasons given as to why Mr Josh Black received 15 points instead of 5 points, which after looking through the other punishments for SOP violations, appears to be the standard number of points given out. The SDAC agrees that Mr Black did intend to unload the truck. This is a clear breach of SOPs. This said, most SOP breaches are clear breaches of SOPs. Whether a breach is clear and whether it is intended are both considerations as to the size of the punishment given. Similar past offenses are also an aggravating factor. Here there appears no similar past offenses on record or in the evidence provided to us. Mr Black has a number of past offenses, including past cases with IA. These to somewhat make Mr Black's offense more serious HOWEVER, the number of overturned cases against Mr Black also tends to the conclusion that the IA officer prejudged Mr Black deciding to give him enough points to terminate him once again. Remorse, shown clearly by handing back the money, and hence the lack of any financial impact, are mitigating factors and should have been accounted for by the IA Officer. Officer Ninj Red failed to account for these factors in the case file. (See IA Officer's Statement) Mr Josh Black also attempted to stop his breach of SOPs. The SOPs clearly set the offense being the actual storage of the transport truck, not starting to store the truck. Therefor Mr Black only committed a breach when he finally unpacked the truck whilst off the island. Mr Black did attempt to stop his actions however unfortunately it was impossible to stop the storage through the means he attempted. This shows a lack of intention to actually commit the offense. Instead it reveals a lapse of judgement over a few seconds which he then attempted to remedy. Officer Ninj Red failed to account for this mitigating factor. After considering the mitigating factors, the SDAC finds that this was nowhere near the most serious SOP breach. There are some aggravating factors but also a number of mitigating factors which appear to have been ignored. Just because an SOP breach is 'clear' does not make it the maximum punishment. This is also supported by other SOP violations which were 'clear' but only resulted in 5 points. As Officer Ninj Red failed to consider evidence before him, the SDAC finds an error in law and after reconsidering the facts of the case above enters the following orders. Orders Mr Josh Black's points for SOP violation be varied to have a punishment of 5 points. This removes 10 points from Mr Josh Black's Record. (-10 points) Mr Josh Black be reinstated to the rank of Trooper in Patrol department of Kamdan State Police. (Termination Removed) Mr Josh Black be suspended for 7 days from the date he was originally terminated from the Kamdan State Police. Any time served in termination is to count as time served in the 7 day suspension. (Replaced with Suspension)
  7. Jack Fire

    Removal From Position Policy

    ANZUSGaming Removal From Position Policy This policy applies to all faction (Police, ect.) removals and staff removals. This policy does not apply to internal management of gangs. All major disciplinary action must be made over voice, not over discord message, with an opportunity with the person being disciplined to hear the charges against them and have a chance to defend themselves before the decision is finalized. This chance to defend one self does not include interviews within the investigation process such as IA interviews. The chance to make a final defense must be given after all evidence is collected. A person has the right to know what incident they are being disciplined for. This includes seeing at least some of the evidence against them to be able to understand the situation they are facing. If the complainant (person reporting) wishes to remain completely anonymous, their evidence must not be released. However the person must be given a summary of what is contained in the evidence. If the evidence is confidential the liaison officer (or lead team for staff) must approve the discipline and be involved in the meeting process. A 'major disciplinary action' includes the following: Blacklist Termination/Removal Demotion of 2+ ranks Demotion within the 'command' structure of a department. (SLT, Command of PD and EMS, ect.) The process for major disciplinary action is as follows: The person is required to arrange a meeting time within 2 days of being sent a discord message. The person must be able to meet within a reasonable amount of time. (4 days from the initial message unless an LOA was approved) The person is given the chance to defend them self at the meeting. The person has a right to legal counsel to be present. The Faction SOPs or Laws of Kamdan may set out whether the persons legal counsel has the right to speak. Unless otherwise allowed, legal counsel is not there to represent their client and talk for them, they are just there to watch and remind their client when to exercise their right to silence.(For RP related scenarios) If the person fails to respond or meet these requirements the person may be given discipline over discord unless there are special reasons why they cannot meet these requirements. (e.g. LOA without internet which was approved) A member of SMT not involved in the disciplinary action may waive this requirement. The person may be suspended whilst awaiting the meeting. Other disciplinary actions may be done over discord however the person must be given the chance to hear the charges against them and have a chance to defend themselves before the decision is finalized. This may be done over discord, on teamspeak or ingame. The person has a right to legal counsel to be present. (For RP related scenarios) The person must be told the proposed punishment. The person has up to 24 hours to respond to the charges. Once they provide a statement of defense the discipline may be finalized. If the action is done in game and the person is online, they have 30 minutes to seek legal counsel. The persons response/statement of defense must be considered and not just ignored. This is considered both a server rule and a Law of Kamdan
  8. @George Arrest warrant has been issued in relation to this sentence. I am satisfied that the sentence has not yet been served. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kfjqReSPCajnWIFcg-nV2BJICN7TWzYVADxu41xQmLc/edit?usp=sharing
  9. @Liam Forder Applications for sealing of your records can be made to the Kamdan District Court. However, it is unnecessary to have your records expunged as KSP does no criminal activity checks with applications. As this case is yet to travel through the District Court, this application is rejected until such an application is made.
  10. Jack Fire

    Josh Black - Point Appeal

    @Ninj Red As long as nothing is missing it’s all good to just leave the case. I know Dingas has access. Im just trialing this to hopefully reduce documents being lost by tagging all persons mentioned as running the IA case or issuing the discipline.
  11. Jack Fire

    Josh Black - Point Appeal

    Senate Disciplinary Appeal Committee Disciplinary Appeal Case Number: A009 Kamdan Legislature Officer Presiding: Jake Dingas Josh BLACK APPLICANT and Kamdan State Police RESPONDENT As this discipline was approved by State Command and is in relation to a termination, the SDAC will deal with the appeal. @Kain McCloud @Ninj Red - Please forward all relevant evidence to Senator Jake Dingas within 36 hours so that review may occur. Please also copy all evidence to myself for the SDAC registry. Other motions may be made by reply to this topic.
  12. Jack Fire

    Point Appeal - Appeal Sparker Ramirez

    Senate Disciplinary Appeal Committee Disciplinary Appeal Case Number: A008 Kamdan Legislature Officer Presiding: Paul Phantom Sparker RAMIREZ APPLICANT and Kamdan State Police RESPONDENT As this discipline was approved by State Command and is in relation to a termination, the SDAC will deal with the appeal. @Pitbull.Emmers @Kain McCloud - Please forward all relevant evidence to Senator Paul Phantom within 36 hours so that review may occur. Please also copy all evidence to myself for the SDAC registry. Other motions may be made by reply to this topic.
  13. Jack Fire

    Punishment Report - Jose Mourinho

    You're such a Gangsta @Jose Mourinho
  14. In the Kamdan District Court Criminal Division As per the Kamdan Courts Constitution Act Case Number: [Office Use Only] Kamdan District Court Officer Presiding: [Office Use Only] STATE OF KAMDAN PROSECUTION and ADAM LEX DEFENDANT Form 1A Booking Report IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF KAMDAN KAMDAN CITY REGISTRY TO: THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF KAMDAN CITY, KAMDAN TAKE NOTICE: OFFICER DETAILS Arresting Officer (Last Name, First Name): Fire, Jack Badge Number: SO05 Rank: Captain Timezone: GMT+11 SUSPECT DETAILS Name of Suspect (Last Name, First Name): Charges: Count / Charge 1: Possession of Class 3 Firearm Count / Charge 2: Discharging Firearm Count / Charge 3: Accessory After the Fact: Manslaughter Count / Charge 4: Evading Police Suspect Status: Released on Bail with security of $80,000 PROBABLE CAUSE AFFIDAVIT Narrative: At approximately 3PM on the 26/10/2019 Captain of HR Zach Green set off a panic button just south of Riverside South. I was the first to respond on scene. Upon arrival I found the officers car, which had been stolen, and 3 civilian cars, two of which were driving around. These two cars were a black/red mini cooper and a black Range Rover Sport. Officer Zach Green's body was clearly visible. I chose to attempt CPR instead of chasing the suspects. My drone camera observed the ground near Kamdan Deep Suberbs and in Kamdan South. Units, including myself moved to the area to attempt arrests after officer Zach Green was revived. Upon finding them near Kamdan State Police Headquaters, units gave chase. After being rammed by the mini cooper we had to repair and I lost visual. Other officers remained in pursuit. After catching up we observed a purple range rover beginning driving from the crashed minicooper. For this reason we decided to attempt a traffic stop. In this attempt an officers car was destroyed due to bumpy road surfaces. The suspects range rover was disabled. They then began to run on foot into the houses beside their car. At this point we managed to detain 3 individuals at gun point, including the defendant. Mr. Green can confirm these men were the ones to critically injure him. When attempting to move the suspects to the car, the suspect in the stolen police asset returned and attempted to murder an officer. He was charged accordingly. All suspects, including the defendant were read their rights. The defendant was told he was under arrest under probable cause that the police believed him to be involved as an accessory to attempted murder. He was also arrested for evading police. Upon reaching DOC, suspects were transferred to processing rooms. When the individual who shot Zach Green was strip searched, the defendant managed to pick up the class 3 and threaten officers. He was faced to the wall where he discharged the firearm about 5 times. In the process of attempting to re-restrain him the cuffs slipped and he turned on officers where I then rendered him unconscious by use of lethal force. The medic then assisted him and cleared him for processing. The suspect was then searched and 2 class 3's were found in his possession. The one he picked up and a second in his backpack. Processing continued as standard. Evidence (If Any): Affidavit as above. Affidavit of Mr Green and any other officers https://imgur.com/a/EkYdGQF Bodycam footage to be supplied once rendered by Police Digital Forensics Filed 26/10/19 Signed, Jack Fire Jack Fire Kamdan Sheriffs Department
  15. Jack Fire

    Cant start a major when you have more people than cops

    I think be definition, even if something is civ sided, if one side has significantly more numbers than the other they should still be able to win....
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By viewing ANZUSGaming's website you agree to our Terms of Use