Jump to content
Click here to install our Arma 3 mods!
Texas: 0/150
Teamspeak: 0/150

Ryan Hancock

Member
  • Posts

    784
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Everything posted by Ryan Hancock

  1. All respect although I personally feel that is a matter of opinion. Apologies in regards to conflict I was not aware that had changed. My stipulation still stands in regards to supply in comparison to demand. Unless crafters are constantly online and are constantly making class 3s then I don’t feel it’ll be enough to keep up with the demand of players. I can agree 4.0 was harder across the board. Although it indicates that premise or basis did not work in my opinion (unless it is made extremely easy to craft), there was never really enough people crafting class 3s alongside a number of crafters got burnt out and left after constantly doing runs to keep up with demand. From a player that was putting 30/40+ hours a week in 4.0 I can argue the point that covid ending was not the only reason to 4.0 player base dropping. A vast amount of players got fed up, bored etc. Although yes some did leave cause of covid ending. I can agree 5.5 was too focused on combat but as stipulated before in my own opinion I do not feel making class 3s in shops expensive is exactly the right answer to counteract this. If class 3s in shops are more expensive I do feel major prices will need to be buffed. And if you want to give it a go by all means. I will also like to bring up the point of people that will play in low player count times that they will struggle to find any crafters to supply their class 3s therefore forcing them to purchase at a higher price at a shop therefore draining their bank account and driving them away from wanting to play. This is only a potential problem that might occur (it might not) and I feel should be taken into consideration. Although I still stand by my opinion with the best option being low tier class 3s in rebel for an affordable price and then crafters controlling the market of a wide variety of higher tier and better class 3/4s. Even if that means reducing some of the class 3s in the shops. My main concern still lies with me not wanting to see Anzus fall under a re-run of what has occurred in the past where it didn’t work resulting in player loss and lowered player retention.
  2. Welp. Okay. Brutally honest time. This has been done before and it flopped badly of which resulted in Anzus player base dropping considerably in 4.0. This feels like a re-run of previous mistakes. 25k for a class 3 is ridiculous you’ll be doing a Knox and a payout will only just cover the class 3 you used if your lucky. Nevermind other majors won’t cover the cost of a class 3. Conflict will completely die off if this becomes a thing so all the hard work you’ve put into conflict will be thrown out the window so if this becomes a thing you might as well remove conflict with it. Not to mention the fact that people grew to hate crafters only for class 3s cause crafters could never keep up with the demand of the players wanting constant class 3s. It just doesn’t work. If crafters are offline and player has no class 3 they don’t want to play because they can’t get a class 3 to use or have to pay a ridiculous amount for a class 3 which won’t happen and will drive players away. Not all people want to have to constantly contact crafters for class 3s. Anzus already has so many massive money sinks, don’t make another one. Majority of people in 4.0 grew to hate SMGs and Pistols only in shops so don’t repeat that again. I’m all for low tier class 3s being in shops for a reasonable price and higher tier being crafting but anything less than that is a big no from me. Overall I feel Option 3 is the best one for Anzus as a whole and the longevity of Anzus alongside keeping the player base happy.
  3. Name: Ryan HancockMain role on the server: SWAT CaptainTime at ANZUS: Joined May 13th 2020, 3,700 Hours.Opinions on each rule and what you voted: 1. I feel like the 'all cop response' aspect is good. Even though PD don't have 'response numbers' we are still managing our numbers well and trying to make situations fun and fair for both sides. With this in place it takes out the constant fear for cops that they are 'over-responding' and stops civilians complaining in regards to over-response. I think this is a lot better for the overall mentality. 2. Yes, I feel gangs should be able to use all of their numbers awake at the time. Although yes some gangs may do a 15 man knox for example which is a bit excessive. I do agree with restricting majors to 12 people. There is no situation where you would need anymore than 12 people at a major crime. 3. If your doing an illegal run it should be a risk. You can always do your illegal runs in groups so your able to protect yourselves if someone was to attempt to rob you. It's illegal for a reason, expect people to try and steal it from you. 4. I am yes on this up to a certain extent. A concern I have with this is new players getting robbed and it deterring them from playing the server as they are unable to get a foothold. Although gangs should be able to recognise people with apples above their heads being new players and should not rob them. But eitherway if someone is going to initiate on you 90% of the time they have a reason to why, maybe they're trying to rob you, maybe they're trying to take you hostage or maybe you just annoyed them. Majority of the time there is a reason behind it. The people that go around initiating on everybody for no reason whatsoever can always have restrictions imposed upon them. Adjusting this rule gives people more freedom and makes it so people won't be scared of getting reported if they initiate on someone not wearing a rebel vest. Part of me does feel people may go overboard with this and if that is the case it can always been reverted back to rebel vests although I feel the vast majority of people will use common sense when deciding to initiate on someone, it would just be a minority that ruins it. Acknowledgement that you've taken a spoonful of concrete: Yes.
  4. Enjoyed it a lot, throughout this weekend I saw quite a few old names that I haven't seen in quite a while. I feel this rule-set might encourage old players to return to Anzus. Even though this rule-set is more 'laid back' and 'combat friendly' I still saw a lot of good roleplay from people. But as for an overall, I really enjoyed this weekend and I think we should keep it like this permanently.
  5. Persons name you think should be unbanned: Taylor LongDoes the person acknowledge what they did was wrong: Yes What attributes do you think this person could bring to ANZUS? Understands why he was banned. He was always willing to help people, if that was new players or long term players, literally would help new players with anything they needed help with. He had a great reputation within the community itself. He was a veteran (had been here since 2.0 until he received his ban). Enjoys combat although at the same time is willing/enjoys roleplay. He waffles a lot. Everyone knows Taylor and everybody loves him.
  6. Your name: Ryan Hancock Your age: 19 Do you agree that applying for testing means you're willing to put A LOT of hours into testing runs, scripts and helping developers when they need a testing partner? Yes
  7. Name: Ryan HancockLocation: (State, Country): United KingdomInternet speed: (Speedtest.net picture do not show your IP): Operating system: WindowsYou agree to keep everything private and not leak anything: Yes.
  8. Name: Ryan Hancock Time played on 4.0: Over 1,000 (I have over 2,300 Hours on Anzus Total.) Do you have anything in the next two month(s) that will effect you being able to help testing: Nope. Do you understand you will be expected to do hours of tedious tasks: Yes, I have a wide variety of experience testing things. Do you understand you will be required to sign an NDA: (Any long term/trusted ANZUS members will not be required to do this) Yes.
  9. Oof I voted for the wrong one by accident. Was meant to vote for Taki
  10. Fat +1. Good job man. Appreciate all the hard work :).
  11. Name: Ryan Hancock Time played on 3.0: The whole of 3.0. Joined on May 13th 2020. Total hours - Around 1,300-1,400 hours worth of playtime since 3.0 was released. Do you have anything in the next month that will effect you being able to help testing: No, I’m free every single day and play every single day. Usually tends to be 6+ hours a day. Do you understand you will be expected to do hours of tedious tasks: Yes (got lots of experience with this due to my past with developing servers/running a large community and writing scripts etc). Do you understand you will be required to sign an NDA: (any OG anzus people will not need to do this) Yes
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By viewing ANZUSGaming's website you agree to our Terms of Use