Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

Matt Pad

Member
  • Content Count

    369
  • Donations

    $0.00 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

29 Excellent

About Matt Pad

  • Rank
    Old Timer

Recent Profile Visitors

329 profile views
  1. Matt Pad

    Matt Frost - DAO Application

    Personal Information: Name: Matt Frost Age: 18 Steam64ID: 76561198163718888 Country of Residence & Time zone: Denmark, UTC+1 Discord ID: IconiC#1651 Character Questions: Do you currently possess a BAR license?: Y Have you been convicted in the last week of any felonies?: N Please list any previous experience as a prosecutor below, or any other relevant experience: Assistant Chief Public Defender for 5 months, 2 of which I was in the position of Acting Chief Public Defender. Why do you want to join the Prosecutors office?: (50 word minimum) I would like to be a part of DAO as I am really passionate about being a Prosecutor. I have previously been in the PDO for about half a year where I got a lot of praise for doing my job well. As there are several fellow attorneys who have encouraged me to apply for the DAO, it confirms to me that I am suitable to be a Prosecutor. I love getting into challenging situations and find it exciting to be in the middle of a court case. I want to develop as a player, at the same time as I make sure that a courthouse is a place where you can properly RP. Personal Questions: Are you fluent in English?: Yes Is this the first time you are applying to the DA's office?: Yes Why should you be accepted into the Prosecutors office?: (50 word minimum) I believe I am the best candidate for the position because I am the type of person that sets something in front of me and goes for it. I put all my effort into it. I am also the type of person that does not like to sit around and let something bad happen in front of me. I always like to get involved in something. So you might ask what is the main thing that sets me apart from others, well the thing that sets me apart from others is my ability to lead others, communication, maturity, discipline, respect. I am a very good and experienced leader. I have been in many leadership positions and have done good in them. I know how to manage things very well. I have led many things and they have turned into great things. I am good at communicating with others. I keep everyone updated on what happens. Then I know that being in a very tight team that communication is key because without communication there would be no team or squad. Communication is key with almost everything. Then maturity, I consider myself to be very mature because you need to be decisive with your actions. You also can’t act out. You need to be firm and confident in everything that you do. The next thing is discipline. Discipline is key to hold your self inline. It is also used to hold yourself accountable. Next is having respect. You have to respect others no matter if they have a higher position or if they have a lower position. I know how to respect others no matter what position they may be in. I treat them equally as they should be. You can’t go into a situation with the mindset that you are better than they are. Do you affirm that to the best of your knowledge the information above is correct?: Y
  2. Matt Pad

    The People of The State of California v Richard Baer

    That works fine for me
  3. Matt Pad

    The People of The State of California v Richard Baer

    16th works for me
  4. Matt Pad

    The People of The State of California v Richard Baer

    1800 EST is gonna be about midnight for me so if we can do it like an hour earlier or in the weekend that would be nice
  5. Matt Pad

    Matt Frost - Payment Request

    Your Name: Matt Frost Your Position/Rank: Academy Head Supervisor Money Recipient: me Agency/Department/Company filing on behalf of: LDSA Amount requested: 140K Reason for withdraw: Payment for Academy cases done Do you confirm you are authorised on behalf of the agency or department you are filing for to request such funds: y Do you understand that misuse of funds is a criminal offense and you will be prosecuted if found doing so: y
  6. Matt Pad

    The People of The State of California v Richard Baer

    Your Honor, I will be available Saturday at 16:00 - 21:00 EST @Loxxon Husky @Tom Najail (notifications)
  7. Matt Pad

    The People of The State of California v Richard Baer

    Your Honour, The time my client was read his rights and given a rights card is a key part of the admissibility of evidence. If my client was never properly read his rights then the prosecution cannot use his own words against him. "Anything you say can and will be used against you in court of law" as the rights are said. You yourself said "provided" which means there is a chance he was never properly read his rights at all. As you said "The peoples claim of confession, allegedly, happens after your client was read his rights." I have know you to be a judge that acts in the scope of law and facts never on the basis of alleges and unproven facts. This statement alone backs my point that he never understood his rights. Now, in the eyes of the judge it wasn't a certain fact that he was read his rights correctly at all. 4 & 5 are key notes of my defense of my client, they quote my clients right and to have them disregarded as irrelevant begs some serious concern so I urge you to look again. The evidence is not relevant as it only show my client was on bail for alleged crimes that we are now looking at. What does bail bring to the value of this case your honour as I am confused and see no value to added to case because of a bail post. In adition I ask the removal of all witnesses bar the arresting officer & the officer who who apparently read my client their rights. At the current moment, the amount of witnesses given who can give record of events are overwhelming to say the least, for us to go over all the witnesses who would be describing the exact same events and the events seen in Exhibit A, would be a massive waste of time and has been interpreted by the defence as a tactic employed to slow the defence. I would like to invoke Rule 708. Exclusion of Witnesses. At the request of a party the court may order witnesses excluded so that they cannot hear the testimony of other witnesses, and it may make the order on its own motion. I invoke this rule as their is concern that the multiple witnesses may just copy each other as the statements are given which would be, of course un fair and prejudicial towards my client. Should get my scheduel tomorrow so will post my availability around then.
  8. Matt Pad

    The People of The State of California v Richard Baer

    Your Honour, I have multiple issues with the case being presented to me. I would like to address them and have these concerned duly noted as these issues me violate my client's right to a fair trial. 1. I would like to argue the issue of Exhibit A. Within the video it is clear that my client has not been read his rights until 2 minutes into the video if not a little more. My client was not in full understanding of his rights at this time, this was made clear by a deputy telling him that he is going to give my client a rights card. Without proof of the deputy giving my client a rights card, my client's right against self incrimination is still in effect. 2. Anything said within the video up to the alleged part of my client understanding his rights in full cannot be used against him due to my clients right to self incrimination and that selection being inadmissible in court. 3. My client has a god given right to defend himself from harm and that right is extended to his property, as stated within the Constitution of The United States. 4. Use of force in these matters to defend ones self and their property is not applicable, it is only a police standard operating procedure to match force with criminals. Not a matter of civilians to match force. 5. If the police knew that a possible crime was committed, and did nothing to secure the possible suspect, them they have failed within their duties and failed their oath to protect and serve. 6. I would like to have Exhibit A & B as they do not add any value to this case, A only leads to confusion and may mis lead the judge and the other adds no value to the case at all. I Invoke Rule 504: Exclusion of Relevant Evidence on Grounds of Prejudice, Confusion or Waste of Time. As of now i do not know my scheduel for the next week so i do not know my availability but i will get back to you on that ASAP
  9. Matt Pad

    The People of The State of California v Richard Baer

    Your Honor, My client wishes to plea not guilty to all charges. On another note. At what point does my client get his rights read? At no point in the evidence provided by the state do i hear anyone mention ANY part of the Miranda rights nor that he has been giving a Rights Card. Without evidence by the state showing that my client was informed of his rights on the spot where he was questioned by the SWAT members his statements are inadmissable in court as the Supreme Court rulled with the caselaw from Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)
  10. Matt Pad

    The People of The State of California v Tariq Jamal

    Your Honor, I will be Assigning @Jack Chapman as counsil for Mr Jamal. Sincerely, Matt Frost
  11. Matt Pad

    Aiden Sparker - Payment Request

    You contacted the wrong person but i approve
  12. Matt Pad

    Harvey Specter - Payment Request

    Approved.Matt Frost, Acting CPD
  13. Matt Pad

    Payment Request Jack McVite

    As the Acting Chief Public Defender i will approve this.Matt Frost, Acting CPD
  14. Matt Pad

    The People of The State of California vs. Jack Twitch

    Your Honor @Tom Vinci,I will be assigning @Jack Chapman as Lead Counsil for Mr. TwitchSincerely, Matt Frost
  15. Matt Pad

    Harvey Specter - Payment Request

    As the Acting Chief Public Defender i will approve this. Matt Frost, Acting CPD
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By viewing ANZUSGaming's website you agree to our Terms of Use