Jump to content

Taylor Spogell

Moderator
  • Content Count

    38
  • Donations

    $0.00 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

8 Neutral

About Taylor Spogell

  • Rank
    Contributor

Recent Profile Visitors

110 profile views
  1. Taylor Spogell

    Jordan Delgado - Player Report

    Under Review Hello, I will be taking this case as i find the video has sufficient evidence. @Jordan Sullivan You have been reported for breaching rule: 7.3 if there is a weapon pointed at you by someone and you do not have a weapon in your hand you must comply. You Have 24 hrs to respond with your side of the story. Sincerely, Taylor Spogell - Moderator
  2. Taylor Spogell

    Jordan Delgado - Player Report

    On Hold Hello @Adam Johnson Are you able to supply a video with audio as the current video only has working sound within the first and last 10 seconds. If so please reply with a link to the new evidence. Failure to do so will result in the report being denied due to insufficient evidence. Sincerely, Taylor Spogell - Moderator
  3. Taylor Spogell

    Kirk Evans- Player Report

    Report Denied Hello, At this time i will be denying your player report for the follow reason, There is no proof of Kirk Evans reengaging in the situation. Feel free to open a case on the other officers who reengaged. Sincerely, Taylor Spogell - Moderator
  4. Taylor Spogell

    Player/Gang Report

    Report Closed Report Closed at the request of @John Olsen Taylor Spogell - Moderator
  5. Taylor Spogell

    Nathan Escobar- Player Report

    Under Review Hello, I will be taking this case as i find the video has sufficient evidence. @nathan escobarYou have been reported for 4.2.1 - "hands up or Die", "Stop or Die" is not valid initiation You Have 24 hrs to respond with your side of the story. Sincerely, Taylor Spogell - Moderator
  6. Taylor Spogell

    Player/Gang Report

    Under Review Hello, I will be taking this case as i find the video has sufficient evidence. @Rigby Harrison You have been reported for breaching rule 4.9 (Once you have initiated you must re-initiate on anyone more than 1km from the original initiation) You Have 24 hrs to respond with your side of the story. Sincerely, Taylor Spogell - Moderator
  7. Taylor Spogell

    Intentional ramming

    Under ReviewHello @Todd Parker, I will be taking this case as i find the video has sufficient evidence. @ScorpionYou have been reported for a General Ingame Offence (10.2 - Civilians (includes rebels) may only ram other vehicles while in initiation. ) Scorpion has 24 hrs to respond with his side of the story. Sincerely, Taylor Spogell - Moderator
  8. Taylor Spogell

    Player Report Tyler Summer

    Under Review Hello, I will be taking this case as i find the video has sufficient evidence. @Tyler Balotge You have been reported for minor exploiting (9.8 You may not use ingame features in an unrealistic manner.) You Have 24 hrs to respond with your side of the story. Sincerely, Taylor Spogell - Moderator
  9. Taylor Spogell

    Russian Roulette?

    Any form of gambling would be a pog addition ot the server
  10. Taylor Spogell

    Jackie Blackie - Decision appeal

    Ive been informed that I'm allowed to respond the this decision appeal so I would like to explain in further detail about both support cases. During the first case I was called in as a third opinion due to you disagreeing with the other two staff members. Upon joining the support case I was greeted with an argument between you and the two other staff members, I tried my best to get you to calm down and let me speak but we ended up having to move to a moderated channel. Craven sent me the evidence and gave his reasoning behind the decision to not give points, the reason being that Jackie claimed that his connection dropped and he was just trying to continue the situation, although what Jackie Blackie done was wrong by returning to the situation I personally agreed that Jackie had no malicious intent. I understand why you are unhappy as at the end of the situation you did die due to this issue, even after this I still wouldn't give Jackie points for something that wasn't an intentional rule break. Once my decision was made you demanded a moderator+ which wasn't available at the time. Once explained you continued arguing resulting in your talk power being revoked, you then proceeded to spam the chat with messages such as "Talk power" or "Moderator its my right" we promptly ended the case telling you to go to the forums to appeal the decision if you did not agree. The second case was dealt by me, you messaged me saying you wanted to continue the previous case even though it had been previously dealt with. Instead of listening to the three support members in the channel you went directly to a senior admin and of course the senior admin believed it was a simple combat log case because he had not heard the context of the situation. You then requested a moderator which I called for, @Ram boyd who promptly dropped that case after finding out it had previously been dealt with. Your attitude throughout the first case didn't help you either with you constantly interrupting staff and spamming the chat. There was more spam than on the screenshot but it was to far up in the chat that I couldn't scroll up
  11. Taylor Spogell

    9000 Member giveaway!

    769
  12. Taylor Spogell

    Weapon Cache | Cops

    I know this isn't in the correct section of the forums but I'm still going to respond. First off only a small percentage of KSP members can actually authorise a weapons cache response, so it's not like cops are at every weapons cache. My second point is in reference to your honey badger excuse, the Kamdan State Police have SOPs which must be followed and nowhere in the sops is a honey badger authorised.
  13. Taylor Spogell

    Rework the Skills/XP system?

    @Doug Jumper I understand and suppose people will just have to suck up and grind XP again but what would happen with stuff ushc as LSD Uranium and rebel?
  14. Taylor Spogell

    Rework the Skills/XP system?

    Ye, so my point is that it shouldn't be reworked because it is unfair to reset people's levels. @Doug Jumper
  15. Taylor Spogell

    Rework the Skills/XP system?

    Resetting the level system is an all round bad idea. Reasons being, no one would have access to rebel or even certain drug runs... Cops earn very little XP so it is unfair on them to reset it and have them be behind civilians when it comes to PERKS. People have actually grinded for there current level and tksing that away from them is just unfair. although a new levelling system would be nice resetting everyone's level makes it not worth it. Another point is alot of the people who are voting have nothing to lose as they are not even close to level 50 and have not had to spend any time into grinding there levels. lower levelled players will always out Number higher level players
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By viewing ANZUSGaming's website you agree to our Terms of Use